Article: Amazon and Apple — The Brooks Review

Amazon and Apple — The Brooks Review
http://brooksreview.net/2011/09/amazon-apple/


There are two huge differences between Apple and most other companies that it “competes with”:

  1. Apple has a knack for understanding what the consumer wants — even if the consumer is still not quite sure what they want. To illustrate this point I think it best to recall a story I grew up hearing about cars in the 50s, the ones with fins running down the back of the cars. The legend, the story, that I have grown up hearing about those cars is the auto makers stopped asking consumers what they wanted and started asking them what their neighbor would want. 1 The people asked then said something like: “Who Steve? He’d probably want something crazy with huge wings or something on it. That guy…” This research led to the finned era of cars (or so goes the tale) and spurred massive sales and pretty wild designs — it was a realization that consumers aren’t very good judges of what they want.

    Everyone said at the introduction of the iPhone that the lack of 3G would be it’s death. That the closed nature and web-only apps would be a problem. The original iPhone was still a hit despite those limitations — because what people actually wanted, what they actually cared about, wasn’t 3G or native apps.

  2. Apple also has shown many times over the willingness to introduce new technology the moment that they can. Some where (again, can’t find the source) there is a quote of Steve Jobs (I believe) saying that Apple likes to introduce new technology while that new technology stills seems magical. This is an important part of Apple’s products.

Enter Amazon

Up and until today I strongly believed that no major technology company was able to both understand and execute on both of these items in any way, shape, or form close to what Apple does. That’s why most tablets that we see simply look like clones of the popular iPad — albeit a crappy clone in most cases.

Today Amazon showed that they, at the very least, understand the first point above. They seem to get what the consumer wants, or at least are willing to gamble on what they think the consumer wants. It’s an interesting and refreshing perspective.

Amazon has never been in the business of providing the second item — the magical technology 2 . Amazon seems to understand that they, as a company, will prosper on pricing — that’s their goal, it’s Amazon’s second item 3 . Amazon wants to ship products that attempt to meet what consumers actually want, at low prices. Apple adds in the magical part, while attempting both of the same things.

It is an incredibly encouraging sign for Amazon, and for consumers, and I for one can’t wait to see how well Amazon executed this vision on the Kindle Fire.

Whether the Kindle Fire is a success or not — it speaks well to Amazon’s longevity in the consumer electronics space.

  1. I doubt this story is true, but the point holds.
  2. Unless you are Prime member, because that can be magical at times.
  3. It too is becoming one for Apple.

Article: Vicente G. Moreno Branding no es pegar el logo "n" veces más que la compentencia. Branding es experiencia. O eres capaz de hacer sentir o haces copy&paste.

Vicente G. Moreno Branding no es pegar el logo "n" veces más que la compentencia. Branding es experiencia. O eres capaz de hacer sentir o haces copy&paste.
http://www.linkedin.com/home

Vicente G. Moreno Branding no es pegar el logo "n" veces más que la compentencia. Branding es experiencia. O eres capaz de hacer sentir o haces copy&paste.

(via Instapaper)

Sent from my iPad

Article: The New Facebook: A Timeline for Personal Discovery and Storytelling Brian Solis

Más sobre F8 y Facebook.. 

Brian Solis en torno a las novedades.. Y Enrique Dans revisando el coste de las mismas para los usuarios...

The New Facebook: A Timeline for Personal Discovery and Storytelling Brian Solis
http://www.briansolis.com/2011/09/the-new-facebook-a-timeline-for-personal-discovery/

Today Facebook introduced features for its users and developers alike that position Facebook not as a social network, but instead as a platform for storytelling and meaningful engagement. How is this different than the profile you’ve come to know over the years? The team at Facebook explains…

(via Instapaper)

Sent from my iPad

Article: Facebook changes: the next generation of apps | Social media agency | FreshNetworks London

Recomiendo la lectura de este articulo.

Me ha interesado especialmente el hecho de que Facebook aparezca con Spotify en el escenario (dando por supuesto que para ganar la batalla de las interacciones en un terreno donde no son lideres tienen que aliarse).

La industria ha sido unanime. En F8, Facebook ha dado un paso adelante en la batalla que hemos mencionado como clave en el universo digital. Identificar a Facebook como el principal actor en la obra de software <Persona> <verbo> <objeto> es mucho mas que un club de amigos y si me permitís, la mejor definicion que he visto de la interaccion digital.

Veremos.....

Facebook changes: the next generation of apps | Social media agency | FreshNetworks London
http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/?p=9739

(via Instapaper)

Sent from my iPad

Article: AppleInsider | Apple's iPhone has 89% retention rate, next nearest hardware is HTC at 39%

AppleInsider | Apple's iPhone has 89% retention rate, next nearest hardware is HTC at 39%
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/09/22/apples_iphone_has_89_retention_rate_next_nearest_hardware_is_htc_at_39.html


By Neil Hughes

Published: 11:03 AM EST (08:03 AM PST) A whopping 89 percent of iPhone owners have indicated they will stick with Apple for their next handset, dwarfing all other hardware makers, according to a new survey. The next nearest competitor to Apple in terms of hardware manufacturers is HTC, which earned a 39 percent retention rate among users surveyed by UBS Investment Research. The biggest loser in the survey was Research in Motion, whose retention rate has dropped from 62 percent to 33 percent in the last 18 months. Rounding out the top five companies in terms of retention rates were two more Android vendors: Samsung and Motorola, earning 28 percent and 25 percent, respectively. Android fared better when users were asked solely about software, as 55 percent said they would stick with Google’s mobile platform. But an additional 31 percent of Android users also indicated they are likely to switch to an iPhone for their next handset, leaving Apple a sizable chunk Android users. UBS analysts remarked that Apple’s retention rates have held up “incredibly well,” even as the market share of the iPhone continues to grow. In fact, when looking solely at consumers who plan to switch smartphone makers, Apple is a huge net beneficiary. More than 50 percent of those looking to switch plan to buy an iPhone, while just 10 percent of switchers plan to ditch the iPhone. The survey shows Apple as only one of three net beneficiaries in the market, as the poll suggests Samsung and HTC will narrowly add more customers than the number they lose. Users did indicate that they intend to leave RIM and Nokia smartphones in droves.

imgimgimgimg